About Me

Name: Bruce Deitrick Price
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Has anyone figured out why it’s so difficult to improve the public schools?? Okay, I’ll tell you.

I’ve been working on this question for more than five years. I would argue that it’s a lot more complex and murky than most people would ever imagine.

Haven’t we all watched, for decades, as the government dumped billions of dollars on the public schools without accomplishing very much?

Haven’t we watched the big foundations try to make a difference? And as well the think tanks, commissions and pundits? But what changes?

Keep in mind that we are the richest country on the planet, and that we spend more dollars per student than anybody else. Probably two or three times as much.

Note that in every city in this country there is an excellent private school. These schools are your templates if you are trying to create an outstanding public school. Why do our educators seem to ignore best practice, and instead perpetuate worst practice?

The closer you look, the more the mystery grows.

Okay, I do want to create some drama here. I want to pull everyone into the puzzle. The mediocrity of the public schools is a great problem that we need to solve, otherwise we will keep recycling the same failures.

I’ve just published a complete solution to this mystery on my site Improve-Education.org. Here’s the mini-version:

The historical fact is that, starting a century ago, our educators got sidetracked by social engineering schemes. It was a private decision they made; and they didn’t want the public to know. So at that point we entered a twilight zone, and we are still there. There’s a big pretend that public schools are primarily trying to serve academic ends. Not true.


My pathway into this whole thing, more than anything else, was the reading wars. Specifically I really focused on Whole Word for about a year until I could finally say: this thing can’t possibly work; it’s a hoax; it’s child abuse. Now, place those assertions next to this fact: our educators kept Whole Word in play for 70 years and created 50 million functional illiterates. Something’s rotten at Teachers College. I don’t think you can intelligently argue that our educators were simply making mistakes for 70 years. The number 50,000,000 is way too big. They got bad results; but they kept going. So I conclude the obvious: they were comfortable with those bad results. They were comfortable with lots of Americans not being able to read well.

And once you suspect that this reading pedagogy was never intended to teach reading, you can look at all the other methods more objectively. I’m thinking of constructivism, reform math, self-esteem, bilingual education, no memorization, multiculturalism, cooperative learning, and many others. I believe that these methods were not designed to work academically so much as they were designed to work socially and psychologically.


The pattern was clear to me: none of the most popular pedagogies delivers as publicly promised. But I suspect they all deliver as secretly intended. That is, kids are kept busy in ingenious ways but nobody learns very much.

And that is the reason why it’s so difficult to improve public schools. There is a lot of gunk and goo in the wheels of education. So the first order of business is to identify these bad ideas, expose their flaws, and then eliminate them. That’s the message of “38: Saving Public School--A New Paradigm” on Improve-Education.org.

Read the report and decide for yourself.

My broader thesis is that we can’t save the country if we don’t first save the schools. The progressive educators deliberately dumbed down the schools for ideological reasons. Now we need to deliberately smarten them up by deconstructing the phony ideas put in play by John Dewey and pals, while simultaneously restoring basics and academics to their proper prominence.

(My new book THE EDUCATION ENIGMA also deals with these themes. Available on Amazon.)


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How We Fix The Public Schools

Public schools could do a lot better; everyone agrees. What nobody agrees about is the reason for their low performance. I call this mysterious mediocrity THE EDUCATION ENIGMA. The question is: what happened to American education? Remember, this country spends vast amounts of money on education, but somehow manages to create 50 million functional illiterates.

You might almost suspect that our Educational Establishment is not genuinely committed to education as most parents define that term. This, precisely, is my own conclusion.

I've been writing about education for 25 years; the more I researched, the more cynical I became. At this point I would argue that our public schools are crippled by an array of bad ideas because our Educational Establishment was often more committed to leveling than to academic excellence. And the proper strategy now is to confront this regrettable history; expose and eliminate all these bad ideas; and create a better future.

I've collected 50 of my favorite essays and excerpts in a book titled THE EDUCATION ENIGMA -- What Happened To American Education. It's a fast, lively read covering a great variety of entertaining topics. But the central message is very sober and serious: our public schools have been deliberately dumbed down; and we can deliberately smarten them up.

If you are concerned about education in the US, please skip over to Amazon and order THE EDUCATION ENIGMA. This little book, I believe, can do more to save the public schools than anything else out there. In less than 140 pages, the reader gets a sweeping view of the history of American education, the thinking of the top educators, the inner workings of many of the major sophistries, a guidebook to all the problems in our schools, and a map to a better future.

Not convinced? If you really want to confront the madness of American education, you need only stare at this number: 50,000,000. That's how many functional illiterates our educators created. They did this by promoting a reading pedagogy that cannot possibly work. This gimmick has many names but perhaps the best-known is Whole Word or Sight Words. I'm particularly fascinated by this fraud because it's blatantly unworkable and it turns out to be a paradigm for almost a dozen other bad ideas. Without the presence of Whole Word in American education, we couldn't be so sure -- so serenely confident -- that our educators were often dealing from the bottom of the deck. For more about the flaws in Whole Word, please see "37: Whole Word versus Phonics."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How We Win The Education Wars

For immediate release::::::::::Anyone can reprint any part of this::::::::::Please discuss the ideas:::::::::::::


Education Activist Explains How We Win The Education Wars


Norfolk, Va.--Statistics indicate that students aren’t learning. Parents complain about being dragged into “reading wars, “math wars,” and “education wars.” Businesses have to provide a lot of remedial education. Everyone wonders why public schools, with their huge budgets, can’t do a better job.

Bruce Price, a novelist, artist and education activist, enjoys trying to explain the confusion. “For me,” Price says, “American education is like a big crime scene. You find much destruction and many wounded. I keep seeing the statistic that we have 50 million functional illiterates. Isn’t that dumbfounding...but also totally intriguing? Who allowed this to happen? What were their motives?”

Despite all the gloomy stats, Price is optimistic about the future. “We have to push the schools back to their traditional role of teaching the important, permanent stuff,” he says “That’s what society needs. But how do we do this? Just in the past year, I’ve figured out that more money isn’t the answer, nor are more ingenious policy recommendations. The top educators are too set in their ways. Here’s my suggestion: we have to systematically deconstruct and eliminate all the bad ideas now so damaging to American culture. We can't expect good ideas to succeed until we get rid of the blight. I mean Whole Word, Cooperative Learning, Critical Thinking, Constructivism, Self-Esteem, No-Memorization, Reform Math, Fuzzy Anything, et al. These things are presented as panaceas; but usually they are counterproductive. I try to expose this. I want parents to understand WHY their children aren't learning."


The flagship of Price’s crusade, since 2005, is his site Improve-Education.org, which now presents 38 original articles and 80,000 words of content. He has another 100 articles on other sites, including 35 book reviews on Amazon.com and 18 education videos on YouTube.com.

Price has been writing about education for 25 years and is now one of the country's more aggressive activists. He acknowledges that his investigations have made him cynical about the country’s top educators. “They are much too comfortable with dumbing-down,” he says. “I’m obsessed with smartening-up! Perhaps I should add that I never discuss teachers. By educators I mean the people with PhD’s, the tiny group that actually dictates policy.”

If you’d like the one best paradigm for all the foolishness in modern education, Price suggests Whole Word (which is also known as Sight Words and Dolch Words). His research convinces him that virtually nobody learns to read using this method--that is, by memorizing the shapes of words; but some schools still use it. “I’m always trying,” he reports, “to devise more succinct ways to explain this impostor. I’m very pleased with a chart that compares Phonics to Whole Word--see #37 on Improve-Education.org.”

Bruce Price, who studied English Lit at Princeton, is the author of four books, an artist who has had many shows, and he has always operated a small design firm. “Being in the arts and in business,” he says, “gives me a broad perspective. I know what good schools look like; and I’m very interested in the practical, ergonomic aspects of giving children a superior education. I have a very simple goal: let’s take all children as far as each one can go.”

===

Price writes on a surprising range of topics--robots, constructivism, Taoism, birds, Pavlov, language, sophistry, and many more. His big theme is that all education can be taken to a more productive level. Recent titles include:

Thinking Critically About So-Called Critical Thinking
A Speech to Teenagers About Education
36: The Assault on Math
Education: Excuses, Excuses, Excuses
Educators versus Education
30: The War Against Reading
34: The Con in Constructivism
Saving The American Newspaper (S.T.A.N)

===========
Find these articles in Google. Please contact for quotes, articles, or more information on any part of this release:

Word-Wise
757-455-5020
Bruce Price
Improve-Education.org

Bruce Deitrick Price
wisewords@earthlink.net
Improve-Education.org
Lit4u.com
ArtNorfolk.com
Ieducate.info
Price.myexpose.com



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Educators Prefer Ignorance

Public schools seem to be in a constant state of disarray and low performance. We have to wonder: are our educators hopelessly inept? Or is intellectual sabotage a factor?

Some experts argue that educators have been sidetracked by social engineering, where the main goal is that students have correct opinions rather than that they learn a lot.

Note that schools in Socialist and Communist countries engage in endless indoctrination, but they also find time to teach a lot of information, as required by the traditional educational model. So it’s clear that both can be done.

The striking thing about American public schools is that students stop learning even the simplest things. Children are in school roughly a thousand hours a year, for a total of 12,000 hours from grades one to 12. But in that vast mansion of time there doesn’t seem to be room for a match box of facts. Find Japan on a map? Don’t be silly. Nobody needs to know that.

Can social engineering, as normally defined, explain why American children know very little? I don’t think so. The ignorance is too towering. The more I looked at the shortcomings of our public schools, the more I was forced to conclude: somebody is deliberately aiming very, very low.

The picture starts to make sense if you assume that American educators, at the PhD level, are not social engineers so much as ignorance engineers. All their ideas and policies appear directed at mass-producing mediocrity, to the degree they can get away with it.

Their concern seems not to be with shaping opinions so much as making sure nobody learns anything worth having an opinion about! Perhaps this nihilistic kind of social engineering is more easily snuck into classrooms.

I didn’t reach this distrustful view casually or in a sudden epiphany. No, it was slowly forced on me as I contemplated the pitiful spectacle of math courses that don’t teach any math, a reading pedagogy that doesn’t permit anyone to learn to read, and geography, history and science courses that are not concerned with anyone retaining information.

What we seem to have is a widespread war against civilization, especially American civilization, conducted in every subject and at every level. Here’s a quick run-down of the incriminating evidence in the main disciplines:

MATH: Decades ago, our educators concocted a fatuous fraud known as New  Math. The public laughed. The educators went underground for several years and came up with a bunch of replacements now known (sarcastically) as New New Math. Some of today’s leading textbooks are called TERC, Connected Math, Everyday Mathematics, MathLand, etc. Children taking these courses learn virtually no real math.

To understand this craziness quickly, please see a wonderful video on YouTube titled “An Inconvenient Truth” by M. J. McDermott. Give McDermott 15 minutes and you will understand the vacuity of these programs.

What sort of people would devise math books that don’t teach math?? Ignorance engineers.

READING: It was by studying Whole Word (also known as Look-Say) that I really came to understand the scandal of our schools. This unworkable pedagogy has created  50,000,000 functional illiterates. What could be more vicious?

By all accounts, 99% of children taught with phonics learn to read by the age of 7, or 8 at latest. But children stuck in Whole Word classrooms are made to memorize word shapes one by one (a tedious process), thereby guaranteeing that most of these children will be semi-literate well into high school.

Still worse, this bogus pedagogy is shrouded in sophistry. Even highly educated people rarely understand what Whole Word is. How can the public defend itself against this dangerous hoax? That seems to be the point.

I’ve created some graphic videos that try to explain Whole Word in a few minutes. Please visit YouTube and enter “phonics versus whole word.”

For a longer, more historical analysis, please see “30: The War Against Reading” on Improve-Education.org.

FACTS, IN GENERAL: The dogma is that children should not be expected to memorize ANYTHING. Teachers say: “They can look it up.” In real life, this means that nobody knows nothing. About history, science, geography, the arts, or which way is north.

This rampant ignorance is dramatized every time Jay Leno goes “JayWalking.” I developed “The Quizz--100 simple facts that every high school student should know” to spotlight the same emptiness. (Google “20: The Quizz”)

IN CONCLUSION: Throughout all the years that this dumbing down has been going on, our educators have been yelling for more money. As if that is the key to the kingdom. Not at all. Genuine educators with half the budget would easily outperform the ideologues now in charge. The central tragedy is that these misguided educators seem to have little concern for the needs of children or the good of the country.  Let the people eat cake.

(Please print this piece and follow up the leads at your convenience. That our so-called educators would actually function as anti-educators is THE story of the 20th century.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

YES, Virginia, there was a conspiracy against reading!

The next four paragraphs (from a review I just put on Amazon) are such a perfect little summary of what befell this country, I want to share them with you:
-------
"Kafka can't match this. Imagine a conspiracy (a de facto conspiracy at least) to make sure that children don't learn to read. Then imagine that the very people running the conspiracy also write and publish all the primers and basal readers (e.g., Dick and Jane) that supposedly teach children to read. Then imagine that the same conspirators create an industry of counseling services, testing centers, treatment facilities, and an endless parade of advice books, all promising to help the millions of victims to escape the curse put upon them by this conspiracy! Give it up, Franz. You're little league next to these people.

Which brings us to 'How to become a better reader' (1953), a stellar example of said advice books. It's by Paul A. Witty, a Professor of Education, the Director of the Psycho-Educational Clinic at Northwestern University, the author of many little reading books, and a founder of the International Reading Association. At mid-twentieth century, Paul Witty was Mr. Reading.

What was his secret for teaching reading? It was memorization of Whole Words. What were the results? Massive illiteracy. Witty himself mused in 1950: 'Why are there so many poor readers in our schools?...Is it true that one-third of our high school students can't read at the fifth grade level? That's what one magazine writer estimated in 1946. Other articles have painted almost as bleak a picture.'

So there you have it. Witty and a few dozen people just like him, using an unworkable pedagogy, brought ruin and havoc upon the children of America. And Witty & Company knew it! So, do you posit evil intent, or do you deduce that these were people too dumb to come in out of the rain? That's the big unanswered question of the 20th century; historians should get busy answering it...."

--------
The book, of course, is obscure and not itself the point. I have reviewed two of Witty's books because they let us see directly into the dark heart of what has to be a conspiracy circa 1950.

Study this whole phenomenon for any time at all, and you will surely conclude that human incompetence cannot reach such towering heights, decade after decade. No, we must be talking about towering malevolence. At least, that's my conclusion. If you'd like to learn more about the evidence for this conspiracy, please see "30: The War Against Reading" on Improve-Education.org.

PS The creepy part is how much the experts relentlessly preaching about global warming today sound like the equally assured experts who told the country that children must learn to read via Look-Say.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »